Wednesday, May 25, 2011

For REAL Law Enforcement Only! Imposters . . . Go Wimp Out Elsewhere!


This is for those people in law enforcement who haven’t given up and given in yet – you know who you are. You had a dream when you took your job. You were going to be one of the good guys and you are still doing your damnedest to be one of the good guys. I know you exist – I’ve dated some guys like you, given riding lessons to guys like you, and stood up for guys like you. You stand up for people in need, it’s the least any of us can do in return – is to stand up for you. That’s what I’m doing now and that is why I’m dealing with the mess that I have on my hands now – because I’m standing up for one of the good guys and ya know what I’ve found out? The good guys are catchin’ it on the chin one whole hell-of-a-lot these days. This isn’t how it was supposed to be – this isn’t what you signed on for; it’s not the dream you had when you entered law enforcement; I know damned well it isn’t (You guys who started wearing a badge for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the power you think it gives you can go piss off – that badge doesn’t give you power, your actions create or weaken the power behind that badge and if you are weakening it this message isn’t for you).

I have been on a serious search lately for the kind of law enforcement that I know – I absolutely know – is out there. We have some of them right here in our town, I don’t have to go far to find a good cop – I watched our guys arrest my buddy Audrius and turn him in to immigration and I know how much they didn’t want to do that. They know Audrius, they know the kind of man he is, but their primary allegiance is to the law and the people who entrusted them to enforce that law and they weren’t about to betray either. That is what the good guys do. Real law enforcement, the one’s that still have some balls – they do shit like that without excuses and I know just where to find that kind, but I need federal law enforcement this time, not local. If you are one of the good guys and you are federal this is meant for you. If you are reading this you have probably been contacted by me and you’re checking me out. Well honey, if you don’t have any balls left, don’t bother to get back to me. If you can’t even defend your own integrity, how the hell can you defend me or the law? If what I just said doesn’t have you getting all defensive and running for the “excuse bucket” then please read on; you are who I’m talking to here.

I’m warning you right off: this message you are reading now is subversive as hell. I’ve wasted too damned much time on domesticated “yes men;” don’t have the patience to deal with such sorry-assed imitations any more and I’m looking for a strong, difficult and determined agent of the law. I need someone with the balls and the heart to stand up and do the right thing, but beyond that; I’m out to convince you that you don’t have to let the damned system destroy your dream of who and what you can be. I’m here to tell you that you have a right to be one of the good guys and to be respected for that, but to be that, well . . . It’s gonna take some serious balls these days. There are people out there working hard to turn our whole damned system into one where you gotta go along to get along. I don’t care if you are male of female, standing up for justice is not a task for the soft and malleable – not now – probably never was, but it seems like it’s worse lately, doesn’t it?

First off you’ve got a damned near impossible job these days because there are people around you, people on your own team, who do not have your back unless you dance to their tune and their tune is to pervert the system and bend it to their advantage. But when you took that badge, who did you give your allegiance to, the guy who won’t have your back unless you do as he says, or to the people of this country and the law? That guy who wants to turn our system into one where technicalities, connections and threats rule over solid evidence and provable facts; I’ve met that person – actually I’ve met a few too many persons dancing to that tune lately. That son-of-a-bitch has betrayed the trust of the people and he’s betraying you just as much as me – you aren’t just law enforcement, you know – you’re a citizen too and he’s expecting you to betray yourself right along with us.

Imagine what would happen if little shits like that were gone, if you and your job was respected again. It can happen, but it won’t if you don’t stand up for what you became a law enforcement officer to defend. You don’t have to watch your dreams die. You don’t have to sit and drink yourself stupid while talking about what you used to believe. You can kick back with a brew and your family or friends knowing that you are one of the ones who doesn’t just believe he or she can defend people, can save and protect people, you actually are that person. The system didn’t make you a puppet, you made the system work. I know you’re there. Do you still know you are?

Monday, May 23, 2011

Terrorists

Getting into my car I heard, “Deborah, haven’t seen you in a while,” and turned to see an old schoolmate standing there. For a moment I thought to make a quick exit, this woman never escaped our common New England Puritan background and “unpleasant” would be a generous description of her nature. She is intelligent, proud and stern, with a smile that seldom graces her face and never finds her eyes; people of proper breeding and stature do not smile, dontchya know. Having been raised in a Boston Blue Blood family while sporting the wrong last name myself (a drop of heathen blood to tarnish the “superior” genes), I have made a point of smiling whenever possible – smooths the road for most and irritates the hell out of those who thinks “proper breeding” is something to be applied in the bedroom as well as the stable, and I do so enjoy irritating anyone with that outlook toward humanity. I know; I know . . . It’s wrong, but I have never smoked, seldom drink, don’t do drugs . . . A woman needs some kind of vice to entertain herself with; that is one of mine – irritating well bred people.

But this morning I was seeing an opportunity to do some research: Just what is it that those who have no sense of compassion, who take a rigid stand in favor of the most draconian and destructive of immigration enforcement methods tell themselves to justify their position? It’s baffled me; I can’t find any logic to such an approach and here was a woman I knew would see things in exactly that light, better yet, her husband is from Europe and as dour and hard as she is so what better way to pick up the international justification for a mentality that I find impossible to comprehend?

Instead of tossing her a polite greeting and fleeing the way I normally do, I leaned on my open car door and engaged her in conversation, starting with asking how she was doing selling her house and gently leading into what I really wanted to know. Once I got there I poked around her head a bit, popping the discussion from one continent to another, and found one word that, in her mind, justified anything that any government might do to oppress anyone, even its own citizens - and that word was “terrorists.” It was a bloody mantra for this woman; to her it explained any and all violations of human rights or individual liberty, though interestingly, when she said the word there was no hint of fear in her voice or demeanor. Instead everything about her froze – her rigid face becoming nearly mask-like in its loss of human expression, probably similar to the expressions that originally inspired the first creator of the zombie movie genre.

If I didn’t know the woman I might have been lured into believing that “terrorists” really were, in her mind, a valid reason for such an ungenerous attitude, but she has always been that way. Long before 9/11 my husband and I tried to visit with her and her husband and for the first time ever in our collective years of meeting and getting to know people we went away in complete agreement that we never wanted to repeat that experience; this couple turned negativity into an art form that they then molded and polished to a high sheen – 9/11 just gave them a hook to hang their hat on. But there it is . . . The word is “terrorist.” That’s the justification, that’s the excuse, and . . . Okay, knowing that is about as useful as a fried egg on a leaking radiator; this kind of person is not one whose mind will ever be changed. Really, does it matter what someone like that thinks as long as there are enough laws and adequate enforcement to make sure they can’t carry those thoughts out? Well yeah, I think it does – consider this: ‘People like that influence other people and those other people are the ones who are influencing politicians and you know – what these folks are saying in private is not necessarily what they are saying in public. So all that whackadoodle stuff you’ve heard muttered off in the bushes somewhere about “terrorist cells” just south of the border – all that stuff you’ve thought was too weird to even address . . . Ya might want to rethink that. There are people listening to that. They aren’t taking it out into the open much, but when you chat them up in private, it’s right up there at the top of the list of reasons to dig in their heels and get as low and mean as they think they can socially get away with.

I’m not saying there is no such thing as terrorists, but if we’re going to be dealing with such a word so liberally and it’s going to be used to mold our policies, it would be wise to know its history. There are news clips available from the beginning of WWII of Nazis on their push eastward where they are shown in Lithuania rounding up Jewish “terrorists” and marching them off to be shot at mass grave sites. That word has a long and sordid past. It is a legitimate word, terrorists do exist and they are a danger, but when “terrorists” become the reason for committing acts of terror it’s time to step back and take a hard look at what is really going on and that is beginning to happen in some of our government policies, both in international matters regarding regimes we do not like and in domestic affairs such as immigration enforcement.

You’ve all read my comments about my friend, Audrius Kazenas, now on his third year of immigration detention. Well he’s fought terrorists back in Eastern Europe. The end of the Cold War brought about a number of excuses for such activity. I like what Audrius wrote on the topic of terrorists. He said: “I have great respect for the job that DHS was created to do. I don’t think that there is justification for targeting unarmed civilians for whatever reason, people who do that are terrorists, regardless to their personal loss or suffering. And if you resort to terror in retaliation to terror, you are terrorist, just like the guy that you are trying to get. You are not “avenger” or “freedom fighter” just because other guy came up with this first.”

Those words are from a man who has dealt, face-to-face, with real terrorists in the past and who is personally familiar with some of the worst; too bad DHS does not have as much respect for the job they were created to do as Audrius does. If DHS did, then maybe we would see fit to properly handle all terrorists instead of killing some while financing and protecting others; maybe we could stop thinking that “terrorists” lurk behind every bush on the Mexican/American border; and maybe we would not have to use that word over and over again to justify continuing violations of our most precious rights. Or imagine this: Maybe then the words “with liberty and justice for all,” could return to meaning something. Just sayin’ . . .

Thursday, May 19, 2011

The .38

“Mom . . . please . . . “ my son says to me as I walk into the office. He’s 17, a young man now, strong, capable, a gentle soul with a passion for rock climbing and parkour. He’s supposed to be leaving for school, but instead he’s loading the gun I now keep by my desk instead. “Oh, I forgot to reload that. Sorry; I’ll do it now,” I say as I take it from him and begin sliding the bullets into their chamber. “Please, Mom,” he firmly admonishes as he grabs his backpack and heads out the door, worry in his voice.

How did it come to this? We live in the country on a back road, far from any neighbors so guns have always been a part of life here, but we had them mostly to dispatch a suffering animal quickly or to lob a shot over the head of a bear showing an inclination toward raiding beehives. It has always been a necessary tool, but seldom used and it would gather a considerable layer of dust between outings. My father, who bought this property in the early 60s and lived in this house till the day he died, did for a time keep this same gun in a holster attached under the seat of his chair. When he was in our local town government he had taken on some nasty characters at one point and they had become threatening. Father always said that when people start to threaten it’s because you’re getting close to something, so that is a good sign to do more of what you are doing. He armed himself and forged ahead.

Now it is my turn to arm myself and forge ahead, but how do things come to this? I resent the fact that what was a seldom needed tool that sat in the closet is now a constant companion. I resent that my son is as aware of security as he has become. We moved away from Los Angeles so that our children could grow up without such realities and until I had success in preventing our friend, Audrius Kazenas, from being quickly deported we never locked the door or drew the curtains - and the gun gathered dust. “Mom, please be careful,” my son says as he opens the front door to leave. I earnestly assure him I will, but I hear his key in the door, locking it behind him, not trusting me to lock it after him.

I moved here so that the threat of violence would not dictate our lives. But when federal law enforcement agencies are not responsive, when the law becomes a suggestion to be enforced preferentially; when protecting our citizens becomes a game to be played only if one happens to have the time and inclination to do so, well then . . . teenagers are left to do what those charged with that job can not be bothered to do. My son is protecting me, cares what happens to me. I am old enough to remember when the federal government would do that if a citizen was faced with the circumstances I'm dealing with now. Government was a lot smaller then. What happened?

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Immigration Laws and Reform

A neighbor driving by stopped to comment on how beautiful my forsythia had been this spring; it did give an amazing display, but I had nothing to do with it. My once colorful gardens have mostly fallen into disarray since my friend, Audrius Kazenas, was taken by ICE and I voiced my frustrations to her. She told me how her husband, a retired surgeon, had recently investigated some medicare fraud locally and had sent a letter to alert the authorities. He never heard back. She pointed out that the government doesn’t seem to be in the business of enforcing the law these days and if I expected to get them to I was wasting my time.

I’ve been trying to get them to do exactly that, if they did Audrius would be out now, but their only response has been to cover the tracks of the injustice that has been done to date and try even harder to get rid of Audrius as Audrius has turned into evidence - no evidence, no problem, right? And yet still I persist, only now more deliberately, now I keep records. Where before I sent out letters to one and sundry trusting that someone, somewhere would pick up on the information, look into it, and do the right thing, now I send letters by certified mail with a return receipt. I note the letter sent, date sent, to whom it was sent and the response or lack thereof so that there is a record of who is doing (or not doing) what. If I can not get justice, I can at least catalog the injustice and inaction for someone at a later date as I still firmly believe that at some point something will have to be done about the mess that is immigration enforcement today and when that does happen there will be an opportunity to hold those who abused their position of power accountable.

As my neighbor related her husband’s inability to find anyone interested in enforcing the law on medicare fraud I began to wonder: Is there some kind of law enforcement lottery that we don’t know about? I mean; if there’s something being done that is against the law - as in a felony, not just a civil code violation, is there some kind of lottery we are supposed to enter and if our number comes up we get some investigation, some justice; if it doesn’t, we’re left to fend for ourselves as best we can? Is that what our system of justice has turned into - you buy a number and hope it gets drawn?

But that can’t be - Audrius has just been caught in a broken system, everyone knows that, right? What we need is Comprehensive Immigration Reform, we need Congress to act - till then nothing can be done to fix this.

Are you sure? Have you looked at the law that is claimed to be broken, that the folks in D.C. claim is the cause of all of the horrors the immigrant community is living with now? Yeah, there are some quirks that could be smoothed out here and there, the law needs some tweaking, but the various solutions that have been proposed to fix what we have now looks to me like it is designed to take away even more of our rights and freedoms and the fixes seem to be mostly short-term - kinda takes us from the frying pan into the fire. And are the problems that so many of us are grappling with a problem of the law or of how that law is being enforced? - which is in many cases, illegally. How much of an improvement would there be if immigration enforcement were handled legally?

What would happen if people who have been here beyond 10 years who show that they are of good moral character were given an adjustment of status as allowed by the current law? That would cover a lot of Dreamers and they wouldn’t even have to face military service.

What would happen if family members were granted the hardship waivers (loosing a family member is most always a hardship) that are already allowable under the current law? There would be a lot fewer broken families crying themselves to sleep each night because one or more loved ones have been ripped away.

What would happen if ICE chose to accept the decisions of their own judges in matters of granting relief from deportation under the Convention Against Torture instead of continuing to relentlessly pursue the deportation of those people? There is nothing within the current law that mandates they prosecute torture cases to their last breath.

What would happen if we ran our detention units the way they are supposed to be run? By law, detention is not punishment and yet our detention units do not even come up to the legal standards for housing and caring for criminals who are most definitely being punished. What if detainees were dealt with in a way that really was not punishment, what if that law was actually followed?

Basically, what would happen if our government were to enforce the law without malice, if they were to follow the current law as it is written now? There is nothing in that current law that dictates this present draconian enforcement - nothing at all - so why is it being done? Are those who are claiming that nothing can be done to right these incredible civil and human rights injustices until Congress acts perhaps using CIR as a Trojan Horse to sneak in a few bits of liberty-crushing legislation that the American people would not accept otherwise? If not, why not just fix the part that is broken and start actually following the part that is not.

An end to the creative interpretations of immigration law on the part of DHS/ICE, an action that has created an ever increasing ability of the federal government to hound immigrants who have been living and working here for years while presenting no threat to this country, could go a long way to fixing this problem, and making a federal government agency obey and enforce the law without malicious intent is not the job of Congress. That lays squarely on the shoulders of whoever is sitting in the White House at the time. He claims he will not use his executive authority to ease the pain of the most innocent and vulnerable of victims of this system because “We are a nation of laws.” Maybe it is time to hold him and his administration to the letter of the law and demand that the law be obeyed by our own law enforcement agencies and upheld in good faith instead of causing as much pain and expense to the American people as possible relentlessly pursuing our least dangerous immigrants. If we can not get even that . . . Well, what sort of government is that?!

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Catching Those Bees

“A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still,” is how the old saying goes and like so many pithy old sayings it’s got more truth to it than we are comfortable with. We are prone to convincing people by dominating and defeating them instead of finding and sharing a common humanity and reality to build agreement on while celebrating the differences that absolutely must exist between people if we are to continue to evolve forward. After all, every bit of progress of mankind that was not accomplished by accident happened because someone disagreed with the accepted beliefs and acted on that disagreement. We’ve see a lot of change over the last couple of centuries on the material universe front but when it comes to relationships between individuals, groups or countries . . . Eh, we haven’t traveled all that far. We bash each other over the head with missiles now instead of clubs, but we still get to bashin’ pretty quickly and therein lies the problem. The people who would get along with their fellow man, tolerate and even celebrate differences, are not prevailing. That fact could destroy all life on this planet one day if it continues to rule our world.

Another old saying: “You can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar.” I heard that so many times as a child and, having a rather contrary nature, I used to delight in pointing out that you could catch even more with a rotting corpse and who the hell wants flies anyway? My daughter, who is very much like me, but with the rough and ragged edges all smoothed and polished, responded recently with the observation, “So Mom, change “flies” to “bees” and it works. Okay?” In the process of effectively checking the curmudgeon side of her mom at the very beginning of the conversation she highlighted the truth to the concept. Instead of getting an argument from me on a teensy, unimportant detail that would then sidetrack the more important issue we were discussing, she very smoothly and sweetly handled that and brought us both back on track. That is how it’s supposed to be done. I taught her well – sometimes I suspect partly by being an example of how not to do things.

So about immigration . . . You knew this was going to get back to that, didn’t you? Do you want to be right, or do you want to get something done? There are millions – literally millions of immigrants and Americans who are connected to those immigrants who are living a horror in this country that has no place in any human being’s life. The civil and human rights of millions trump party affiliations and individual preferences every time. Millions of people are more important than any of us as individuals and millions of people are praying that we can come together to solve this problem, to fix what has gone terribly wrong in this country and bring an end to the voracious deportation machine that is ripping the very fabric of family life in this country to shreds. This is so important that I, a miserable, difficult old Yankee, have managed to behave myself and make nice-nice for the purpose of getting this one issue handled. If I can do it, trust me, you can do it! Right now it is time to put down our swords and start finding ways we can get along to get this done (I have done this literally – the new helm I had made for my armor kit just before my friend, Audrius Kazenas, was taken by ICE sits shiny and undented on my desk – I have not indulged in a sword fight since that day). It’s bigger than us and unless we band together to be bigger than it, it will defeat us. Don’t listen to anyone who would throw this movement off track over party or personal issues. We seriously need to attract a few bees, to convince some people through understanding rather than force. Hey – we do this, maybe we can set an example of how people of diverse viewpoints can come together on other things. Ya want peace – this can be a step down the road that leads to it. It’s a start. Just sayin’ . . .

Thursday, May 12, 2011

It's Not On Congress

This post was going to be on another topic, but all this talk of "It's Congress' fault" regarding the human carnage that has become our immigration enforcement system has just driven me right-round-the-bend! I have been raising children for 42 years - too long to fall for the "When I do something right, that's me . . . When I do something wrong, that's someone else" routine. Congress is not responsible for all of the mess we are in now. Congress determines the laws. Congress does not determine how those laws are enforced. Congress did not mandate that they be enforced under this administration in such an extreme way. President Obama is now on track to pass Eisenhower and his "Operation Wetback" for the highest number of illegal immigrants ever deported by one president; he has already passed every other U.S. president in the history of our country in the number of innocent and non-dangerous immigrants deported.

The claim is that the majority of immigrants deported were criminals. Do you want to know what constitutes a criminal by this administration's standards? A mother of four who has lived and worked legally in this country for decades and has a DUI is a criminal worthy of deportation - her citizen husband and children be-damned. A U.S. military veteran of the war in Iraq caught smoking pot is a criminal worthy of deportation - never mind that Obama himself admits that he smoked pot in the past. A man who shoplifted or got caught with drugs as a teenager TWENTY YEARS AGO, paid the price and has since gone on to have a family, start a business and become an upstanding member of his community is a criminal worthy of deportation - to hell with his family, his employees and his community. That is where those statistics are coming from - they are as bloated and as misleading as any statistic coming out of the white supremacist based anti-immigration organizations Washington D.C. is so fond of catering to.

Yes, Congress does need to change some of these insane laws, but Congress does not mandate that ICE be allowed to break as many laws as they want, to commit as many human rights abuses and atrocities as they want in their constant quest to up their deportation statistics. Congress does not dictate that detention should be under worse conditions than the incarceration of criminals. Congress does not promote the obsessive prosecution by ICE of immigrants seeking relief from deportation under the Convention Against Torture. Congress has not one thing to do with any of this!

Our Deporter in Chief has now shown that he is responsible for what is done under his watch. He made that quite clear when our Navy Seals went in and took out Bin Laden. That is good to know - that our president is not asleep at the wheel. I never thought he was. It took a lot to ramp up the voracious deportation machine that is now devouring immigrant and citizen lives alike at an alarming rate - it has not "just happened" all on its own. All those destroyed lives, all those tears, all that waste . . . that is not on Congress!

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Tsunami Women - The Remix

This is for the men, but you ladies might want to pay attention as you can fall prey to one of these women too, through a male child or man in your life, or even directly. To the Tsunami Woman, anyone who serves her purposes for the moment is fair game and they are not just the stuff of myth and soap opera. I’m writing about this because I presently know not one, but TWO men whose lives, along with the lives of everyone connected to them, have been turned upside down by such a woman. One of those men has some relief – the tsunami woman he was unfortunate enough to marry has finally gone too far and is facing possible prison time, but she isn’t in prison yet and he and the women in his family who are her most frequent targets still live their lives drawing the curtains, double checking to be sure the the house is kept locked tight at all times and looking over their shoulder – this while living out in the country where such things are not supposed to be necessary. The other man I know in this situation is still simply trying to survive.

In intimate relationships false claims of domestic abuse are one of the Tsunami Woman's favorite weapons. Anyone who has witnessed one of these incidents can attest to the fact that false claims of domestic violence are a form of abuse in themselves, and yes, they do happen. They are a sneak attack where success depends on a court system inclined to uphold the rights of one group more than another. One of the most horrible experiences that any person can endure in a civilized society is to be a victim of a crime and then have the very system that should provide protection and relief instead assist the perpetrator in furthering the damage. If, for the sake of protecting women, you choose to err on the side of believing the female in matters of a domestic dispute when the evidence clearly points to a greater aggression on the part of the female partner, you have created a system in which the Tsunami Woman will thrive. Do know her victims will not be confined to the few unfortunate males she targets. The victims of domestic abuse do not live in a vacuum and the damage done extends to many. By denying a man protection from a false accuser, you create a dangerous environment for every person who is closely connected to that one man. That one act of tipping the scales of justice, no matter how well intentioned it might be, will harm many and may even put multiple people in danger.

If you haven’t heard the term “Tsunami Woman” before it is because I just made it up for a kind of woman I have become far too familiar with lately. We have all crossed paths with a Tsunami Woman at some point in our lives. For some, like my doctor in Los Angeles, such an encounter turned deadly. He and his wife were the kind of people who could restore your faith in humanity no matter how bad your day had been before an appointment at his office. None of us knew the private hell these people were living until he was shot to death on the sidewalk outside the medical clinic where he worked by an ex wife who had been actively stalking him for two years. During those years of being stalked and threatened he desperately tried to get help, but his ex played a good victim. She was a classic Tsunami Woman. Even after she shot and killed him in cold blood she still continues to play the victim. These women do this so consistently and convincingly that women who really are victims can not match their perfected and carefully scripted performance and so, actual victims of actual abuse frequently find themselves shunted aside while a Tsunami Woman uses all the resources of law enforcement to exact her revenge against someone who at some time said "no" to her.

This kind of woman is a master of manipulation of good and decent people. Who doesn’t like being a hero? Knowing you have saved another person from being victimized results in a pleasurable feeling of competence and control. These women know this and they utilize it. A Tsunami Woman knows humans are hard-wired to understand that any woman will, at times, need care and special attention – we do bear children and we are physically not as strong as a man, so the natural instinct is to protect us. But the Tsunami Woman takes her status as a woman and turns it into a “get out of jail free” card.

Men sometimes thank me when I point out the reality of this kind of woman, thinking I am standing up for them. I am not – I am standing up for all of us who are trying to live our lives in peace. In the end, the Tsunami Woman does as much harm to women and children as she does to men, either through "crying wolf" so many times the legitimate cases of rape or domestic violence that come after her have difficulty being believed – or, where children are involved, through extreme acts of Hostile Aggressive Parenting (HAP) – or through the very real victimization of their target’s relatives and associates. Quite frankly, I am tired of them. Their drama, their perpetual demands, their constant accusations are repetitive in the extreme, they cause very real harm and we really have better things to do than to deal with someone like that.

The fact that a woman is very good at getting other people to help her does not indicate she is a Tsunami Woman; it simply means she is a nurturer. People connected to such a woman tend to thrive. Tsunami Women may have good people skills, but only to the point of getting what they want. Any nurturing or compassion they show is an act, and these women are such accomplished actresses their fake is frequently more believable than the genuine. They aren’t just homemakers – they are diligent and caring homemakers, only their house is a mess. They aren’t just good mothers – everything they do is for the sake of their children, only their children do not thrive. They aren’t just good partners – they are the perfect lover who can stroke a man’s ego till he really does believe he’s superman, only he's no longer his own man. As the Tsunami Woman gets older her past becomes littered with the mutilated lives of friends that have fled, resentful grown children and multiple discarded, used-up "supermen."

Any person who deals with one of these women can see the truth if they look clearly, but the tsunami woman is a master at gauzing the lens. She does not target a man’s “small head” as is so commonly assumed. This is not a gender-specific predator – men, women and children are all at risk when in the company of such a woman. The vulnerable spot she services with skill and dexterity is ego, which is why both men and women can be brought to believe her and children can be convinced to lie for her despite (or perhaps because of) how good she can make them feel if they please her and how badly they know they will feel if they disappoint her. If you want to feel good around this kind of woman then do as you are told, exactly as you are told - make sure that you anticipate her every need and you will be the best, most awesome offspring, lover, friend or neighbor ever! If you wish to maintain a relationship with such a person and you notice a few red flags (no one hooks up with a Tsunami Woman without ignoring some very clear red flags) you might want to move to Stepford.

If the people she has “helped” are now in her past she will also point out how ungrateful the recipients of her largess have been. This woman’s past is filled with an inordinate number of “ungrateful” people who misused and abused her. Anyone can mistakenly stumble into an abusive relationship, but for a normally social person, good experiences with people far outweigh the bad and they are fully aware and ashamed of their own transgressions. The Tsunami Woman, however, is "always faithful, always truthful" – and she will remind you of this over and over. It is all those other people who have lied to her, harmed her and betrayed her. It is never her. If she does take any responsibility in what has happened in any broken relationship it will be in the form of an admission that she shouldn't have trusted that person. It's never anything that she did - it's always that she trusted someone else and they did something awful to her - which justifies everything that she does against that person from that point on.

If you have ever escaped such a woman, you are the bad guy. All the while, her real-time ego stroking of her latest targets is accomplished through portraying herself as a serial victim bravely struggling forward and in need of your help and protection. She will tell her present-time associates they are different, they may be someone within the legal system, her friends, family, children or lover, but they are always her savior. Hindsight examination of her actions toward those closest to her will reveal that all that delightful ego stroking was covertly accompanied by multiple hidden pricks simultaneously deflating that same ego. This leaves her victims confused and more easily manipulated. In the beginning of any relationship with such a woman those pricks are so slight, they are barely noticed and easily explained away, but they have a cumulative effect.

Research in domestic violence has shown that one of the signs of a mate who could turn abusive is an instant, overbearing love of the one they will eventually abuse. Tsunami Women abuse their partners mentally, sometimes physically and in the end through the legal system, but they also take advantage of friends, coworkers – anyone who they feel could be handy in their life. These women form hard, fast friendships in an instance and quickly become demanding of their new friend's time and attention. A normally social and caring person will interpreted such behavior as insecurity and will at first try to accommodate this sort of woman; though they find her needy, that neediness she has for them does provide an ego boost, and thus they are caught into an abusive relationship. When the actions of a Tsunami Woman become clear, just as with female victims of an abusive male partner, those who are looking at the progression of what was done wonder at the gullibility of the target. In fact, any sociable person can be temporarily fooled by this woman. I have been more than once.

This type of woman is especially dangerous and can create far more damage than a violent and abusive man for two reasons. First: Her violence at the beginning is seldom overt or easily detectable and frequently her victim is not believed. Second: In an attempt to compensate for a past lack of protection for legitimately abused and/or assaulted women, our present legal handling of domestic violence and our way of talking about and administering justice for victims of domestic violence heavily favors women. The most unfortunate part of this is female victims of rape or domestic abuse and/or assault by men flounder and have no understanding of the system that they are going to need to gain help and maybe protection, which frequently results in such victims getting help too late or not seeking help at all.

Tsunami Women have no such problem. They know the system well and they know how to manipulate it. Any man who attempts to bring them to justice is in danger of having abuse or harassment charges leveled against him as well. This is a dangerous character to deal with and taking her on is not for the timid or faint of heart – it is a frustrating and too often unsuccessful undertaking. And so, she often walks among us, free, while those she uses, abuses and casts aside strive to avoid further contact with her at all costs. The men who have been her husbands find that when there are children involved it is impossible to escape her revenge. She will torture the father of her children through those children, handicapping their emotional future by mentally manipulating them against their father. Children held hostage in such fashion begin to fail badly and it is not uncommon for a man to give up and walk away in the hopes that his absence will prevent further abuse. This woman is adept at wreaking vengeance and no one is off limits as a tool to exact her revenge.

If you extrapolate out all the damage caused by such a woman through compromised partners, people connected to those partners, abused and damaged children, people who are or will be connected to those children throughout their adult life, the clogging of our courts with vindictive demands for restraining orders or false accusations of domestic violence or even molestation and a general loss of faith in our justice system’s ability to protect the innocent from the guilty, you will find the amount of damage that this one person can cause is truly staggering. Recognizing and properly handling a Tsunami Woman would be the first step to a more peaceful existence for society as a whole.

The above assessment is what I have found through observation, both subjective and objective over a period of years. I have seen these women, I have seen their victims and I have seen the ongoing carnage. It is time for the existence of such a woman to be recognized and dealt with. They have done enough damage. Ordinary people trying to make their way through an already difficult world do not need, nor do they deserve, what this kind of woman will produce in their lives. It is time for those she targets and victimizes who are currently being rendered invisible by a society that insists women are victims and men perpetrators to stand up and declare that we do have rights. The right to a peaceful existence belongs to us. We are the creators of a productive and harmonious society.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Politics for the Politicians

You have a vision of what this country is, what it was created to represent, what it can be. Is that vision being met in what our current political game has become?

Question:
Why do some people adopt a political party and just stick to it no matter what it does or how it operates? I’m talking about the people who are more faithful to their political party than they are to their friends and even their family; the ones who will condone and forgive more violations of the promises and agreements that brought them to that party, than they would ever condone and tolerate from their spouse. If their spouse did half of what their party does to violate the agreements that created the relationship in the first place, to betray their basic core values, they’d be in divorce court immediately with nothing good to say about their soon-to-be-ex; their political party does the same thing and they jump through hoops to explain it away, to make excuses or worse - to decide that they’ve changed their mind and now they are for that party’s new position. Consequently we have two political parties today who are run entirely by money and power where any and all political platforms are open to adjustment or complete demolition from the slightest whiff of a movement afoot that might be difficult or annoy someone with deep pockets. We now have government not “of, by, and for the people,” but rather, “of, by, and for” dramatic thugs and the wealthy.

When John Kennedy wrote his book, “Profiles in Courage,” he highlighted some of the outstanding statesmen who stood up to the political forces aligned against them for the sake of a principle. Today an author would be hard pressed to find a statesman of any kind and would have to be content with stories of politicians who had stood up to a particularly loud protest, but are the politicians responsible? I mean, I know they aren’t a particularly responsible bunch as a whole, but are they responsible for this state of affairs? I know we do blame them loudly and often, but we are citizens in this country, not subjects. Our politicians and our political parties are supposed to represent and answer to us and it is our duty to make sure that they do. To make our politicians toe the line we have to first draw and hold a line for them to toe and we are not doing that.

We had a good system worked out. Over time two parties emerged in this country that loosely followed a liberal and a conservative agenda that balanced each other nicely. This gave the unrealistic and unyielding idealists, those difficult citizens who are absolutely necessary for the maintenance of any vision, a place to call home. The rest of us who were the heart and soul of the voting public could shift our allegiance from party to party and “throw the rascals out” if they got too full of themselves and stopped listening to us. It was messy, but it worked.

That was then. Today neither party’s political representatives support a really progressive agenda and what once defined conservatism has been brutalized. A massive, invasive and intolerant government is not a conservative value. On many critical policies Obama is Bush on steroids. With the way he has handled matters as diverse as immigration to the environment he must depend on the Republicans to maintain his approval rating for him. If so many of our current Republicans were not so avidly embracing policies promoted by eugenicists like John Tanton and roundly faulting Obama for his new, extreme-law-and-order-have-yet-to-see-a-prison-plan-he-doesn’t-like-or-a-right-he-won’t-gut approach to running our country, those who elected Obama and could elect him again would have abandoned ship by now. They stay because of reaction against, not response toward. Our Deporter in Chief is not applauded for his courageous allegiance to the values upon which he was elected since he has effectively betrayed nearly every one of those. His whole claim to legitimacy at this point resides in the simple fact that he is not a Republican. He has perfected the art of gaining political power through the work of the opposing side.

And what of the Republicans? Listening to right or left leaning media today would have one one assume that “conservative” and “Republican” were synonyms; there was once a time that they very nearly were. Today a fiscally conservative small government that respects the family unit, rewards hard work and honest production and recognizes the rights of the individual is laughably parodied by the most vocal factions of that party. Instead of conservative values they give us intrusive, costly and lawless government agencies; they entertain assaults on the integrity of the family unit through, of all things, attacks on the security and sanctity of childhood; they shamelessly cater to their crudest and most reactionary constituents while ignoring those who have supported conservative values for generations; and they have willingly gone along with the current steady destruction of the rights of the individual to live as he chooses, to own property and determine what will be done with that property, to choose his own path in life and be accountable for that path.

If the Democrats of today insist on promoting and expanding Republican programs and Republicans of today insist on driving people back to the Democrats through sheer revulsion, where does that leave us? Our system of government has been hijacked, but it is OUR system of government. This country chose to be free of a monarchy a very long time ago. We are supposedly not subjects who must answer to our government and in the end both these parties should be answering to us. The majority of people in this country are good, hard-working people. They have no time or place in their heart for hatreds or extreme agendas. The majority of Americans, though they may choose to belong to one party or the other, truly belong to the party of “liberty and justice for all.” The majority of Americans are not being served by either the Democrats or the Republicans today and it is time for the majority of Americans to stand up and take those parties back, make them answer to the values of the American people.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Soldiers

It is important not to confuse our wish for peace and our distaste for war with the reasons for which battles are fought and the reality of those who are charged with the task of fighting those wars. The idea that wars can not happen without people to fight them and therefore those who do the fighting make war possible may be true, but only when kept separate from the realities of war.

Looking at the soldiers who fight our wars and holding them responsible for the suffering and horrors of war, which they themselves are often the victim of, while ignoring the many personal sacrifices and hard choices that brought each individual to that war, objectifies soldiers unfairly. They become a symbol, a cardboard cutout of themselves, instead of the very real men and women who face the potential of their own death for purposes that too often have nothing to do with the given reasons for the wars they fight. Some who choose a career in the military may think they know why they are fighting; they may or may not be wrong. There are noble causes after all, but whether war is the only solution remains open to question. Gandhi did much without declaring war, which is not to say innocent people did not die - dead is dead, whether from a bomb, bullet or starvation and sometimes when psychopaths gain power the death of some will be needed to prevent the deaths of many. I’m sure the allied soldiers who liberated the Nazi concentration camps were seen as angels of mercy. I am equally sure that they were far from merciful to the Nazis.

Holding soldiers responsible for war simplifies a complex issue with a number of causes. It is natural to want to find an explanation that can lead to a solution; one would have to be severely twisted not to do so, but to simplify the causes and realities of war is to not confront the terrible toll war takes upon the bodies and lives of the men and women who fight those wars. To do that denies the humanity of soldiers and the very second one begins to deny the humanity of other human beings one has stepped firmly upon the very path that leads to war in the first place. If we truly want to bring an end to war, and considering the potential for mass nuclear destruction we really must do so, we have got to embrace our soldiers and listen to them, learn their stories and know what war is. You can not end that which you refuse to confront. Our soldiers, those who fight, suffer and die for us, are part of that confront.